This
discussion responded to the question, "What are the characteristics
of a good editor?"
|
|
Excellent Editors
Charlotte Observer
reporters say a good editor:
1. Motivates and
encourages; shows enthusiasm.
"Reporters see
you as a partner in producing great stories, not as a schoolmarm ready
to catch their errors. When a story idea or draft isn't clicking, you
can help turn it into something better, rather than being quick to write
it off as a flop. When you have to torpedo a bad idea or point out bad
writing, reporters know it's coming from a foundation of respect."
2. Cares about
making a story better; has the skills to make it better; has an ear for
writing; understands individual styles of different writers.
"A good editor
knows how to make a story better. That means a lot more than deleting
unnecessary sentences or making a story clear or rearranging paragraphs.
A good editor has the skill, knowledge and writing experience to read
a story, digest it, think about its direction, scope, goals, tone, voice
and character development and then figure out which of those need to be
improved to make the story the best it can be."
3. Is honest, honorable,
candid without being a jerk.
"... Has
a conversation where they just brainstorm. They enjoy interacting with
reporters and value the sometimes-untidy process of developing ideas.
They treat reporters like intelligent human beings, not just production
drones."
4. Is trusting
and can be trusted.
"It means
a lot to know that your editor thinks you are up to the job, and listens
to you." "When you resolve a problem with a reporter, you don't talk it
up elsewhere."
5. Is patient;
cool under pressure.
"Won't rush
through line-by-line editing..." "Knows when to panic – and when not to."
"When reporters come into the office, editors give them a few minutes
to get organized before hounding them with questions."
6. Praises.
"We all
like to pretend that we don't need an occasional compliment, but we do."
7. Is an advocate
for reporters.
"Believes
the writer's success is the editor's success."
8. Has good ideas.
"A good
editor sets the tone for the paper, or a section." "Able to articulate
what they're looking for in a story before the reporter starts interviewing.
9. Has a sense
of humor.
"They use it
to break the tension that can develop when reporters and editors sit down
at the terminal together. There's nothing worse that sinking your heart
into a story, only to have the first person who reads it react with a
dour attitude and a big ol' frown."
10. Is flexible
and accessible.
"Not wedded
to their own beliefs about the right way of doing things. They listen."
"You're not
there only for work and the annual review, but for lunch or the casual
conversation. Reporters don't have to make an appointment to bounce a
story idea off you or bring up a concern. Think of it as cultivating sources
on a beat... a good editor should know what's going on with the staff
before there's a crisis."
11. Doesn't surprise
a writer with a lot of memo-mode notes in a story; always checks before
making changes.
"ALWAYS reads
a story start to finish - sometimes more than once -- before making suggestions
or memo marks... They NEVER type 10 inches of comments in memo mode a
the top of the story then pop the reporter a message telling him or her
to take another look at the story."
Michael Weinstein
(The Charlotte Observer)
* * * * * * * *
*
A good editor:
- Has the technical
skills of a wordsmith plus the tangibles of a good journalist and the
intangibles of a good leader.
- Has a positive
"storyside manner" by respecting writers.
- Edits confidently
but judiciously.
- Edits in the writer's
voice.
- Knows when not
to edit.
- Has vision to see
beyond the computer screen, to envision excellence and help devise steps
for achieving it.
- Treats both the
details and the big picture.
- Serves as a resource
for ideas and sources
- Runs interference.
- Makes others' ideas
and copy better not worse.
Carl Sessions Stepp
(University of Maryland/American Journalism Review)
* * * * * * * *
*
- Good editors follow
a priority list that puts readers first, the people who work for them
second and everything else last.
- They carve out
uninterrupted time in the schedule for meetings with reporters.
- When a reporter
comes up to ask a question, they turn away from the monitor and look
at them.
- They don't rely
on e-mail to get across a point they're trying to make about a story;
they get out of the chair and go tell the reporter.
- Good editing takes
a lot of talking.
Where do you find
these people?
Choose those
reporters or copy editors who consistently make deadline, who argue over
wording changes in their stories but do so intelligently and gracefully,
who get along with co-workers. Look for people who show respect for others
by accommodating the copy desk when a trim is needed, complimenting the
designer when their story gets nice display, keeping the graphics department
up to speed on changes needed in charts.
How do you
train for these skills?
Want to
train for a relevant skill? Concentrate on time management -- not the
kinds of training the dayplanner companies will offer, heavy on multi-colored
labels. Train folks on how to cope with real-life time problems, like
a clingy but talented reporter who can never answer a question in less
than 10 minutes, or how to recognize an impending crisis -- say, four
stories about to miss deadline, a reporter who is begging for advice,
a copy editor who wants to discuss a fine point of style and an angry
reader on the phone, all happening at once -- and quickly, politely and
efficiently prioritize and deal with them.
John Kroll (The Plain Dealer)
* * * * * * * *
*
Very good editors
are those who know
- How to edit.
- And how to work
with people, including coaching them.
In many cases, editors
are chosen from the ranks of good reporters.
Some know how
to edit; others don't. The ones who don't know how need to learn and should
be given the opportunity to learn. Some ways this might work: Have them
spend some time on a good copydesk. Or spend some time watching how a good
editor does his or her job. Unfortunately, there seems to be little time
in newsrooms these days for mentoring or "job shadowing." There's
a belief in management these days that leadership and people skills are
more important than the specific skills used by the people one leads or
manages. I'm not sure that works in a newsroom. In my experience, the best
editors knew how a story should be put together as well as any reporter
did; a good copy chief knew how to copyedit or write headlines as well as
anyone on the rim did. Plus, they knew how to work with people.
Finding those
folks isn't easy, and compensating them adequately may be more difficult.
- Great editors have
open mind and admit their own mistakes.
- Great editors have
clear vision, but leave the details to their staff.
- Great editors communicate
that vision.
- Great editors are
respectful.
- Great editors sweat
the details.
- Great editors inform
their staff about what is going on with the paper.
John Russial (University
of Oregon)
* * * * * * * *
*
The two worlds
of the excellent editor:
Word-keeper
1. Keep
the language lively
2. Police the
true meaning of each word
3. Protect the language (especially from doublespeak and cliches)
4. Mean what
you write: Conclusions must equal facts.
5. Make time
to write. Yes, editors need to write.
Editor as trainer
1. Keep your hands off the keyboard: Read the entire story before
editing
2. Sail each story through a sea of questions
3. Talk before, during and after the story is written
4. 1 + 1 must always = 2 in everything you do
5. Get out of the newsroom.
Tom Silvestri (Media General Inc.)
* * * * * * * *
*
Suggested readings:
"Caught
in the Middle" by Sharon Peters of the Northwestern Media Management Center
is a study of editors and their problems. In it, she surveys newsroom
managers, middle editors, and writers about what makes a good editor.
Editing for
Today's Newsroom: New Perspectives for a Changing Profession (Communication
Textbook Series) by Carl Sessions Stepp of the University of Maryland/American
Journalism Review.
Jeff Price
* * * * * * * *
*
I have been an editor
at several levels, including a department head and AME in a large metro
paper's newsroom and editor of a smaller paper with a news staff of about
25. I've spent the last seven-plus years as a reporter. From the varied
perspectives I've experienced, two abilities distinguish the best editors:
- Recognition of
the editor's place. Many editors reached their mid-level or upper-level
editing perch because of their accomplishments as line editors in chasing
the news or handling copy or motivating reporters. Then they celebrate
their promotion and keep acting the part of a line editor, stifling
the chance for new line editors to grow. You see the same thing with
department heads who ascend to such jobs as managing editor. The best
senior editors know that one of their most important jobs is to develop
other editors, and they do that by staying out of the way and resisting
the urge to put their fingerprints on every story.
- Understanding that
next year's paper is more important than tomorrow's paper. Of course,
you have to make sure that tomorrow's paper gets out, and you have to
uphold your standards for tomorrow's paper. But tomorrow's paper is
essentially the job of the line editors. The mid-level and upper-level
editors need to help the staff and the paper grow: through training,
through creation of opportunities, through patience with people who
are learning, through assessment of strengths and weaknesses, through
planning to serve your readers better, through establishing a vision
for the newsroom (or the desk) and by inspiring the staff to follow
the vision.
That's not as specific
as you asked, but I'll give an example: The best senior editor I ever
worked for was Dave Witke, who was managing editor of the Des Moines Register
for several years. I was a young line editor who was in charge of the
city desk on a Sunday. A grain elevator exploded in Western Iowa, and
I couldn't reach the city editor or Dave at home, so I just took the initiative
to send a reporter and photographer by plane to the site. I saw Dave Monday
and said I hoped I hadn't overstepped my authority or blown his budget.
He told me, "I've never regretted sending a good reporter after a good
story, but I have regretted not going after a good story." He praised
our coverage and sent the message loud and clear: The news comes first
here. That helped me grow as an editor and gave me confidence to make
future decisions without looking over my shoulder. And it helped me be
a better senior editor later on.
Steve Buttry (Omaha World-Herald)
* * * * * * * *
*
We have lots of resources
we cite at API, including getting to know your own style better by using
a self-assessment tool such as the Myers-Briggs type or DISC profile.
If you have
a specific topic, I can probably get you some names or information from
previous seminar sessions. You're probably familiar with Linda Cunningham's
presentation on Newsroom Leadership, she does sessions on "Coaching Yourself
in the Newsroom," "16 Tips on Handling the Boss," and "Top Ten Ways to
Build Personal Power." (Linda Grist Cunningham, Executive Editor, Rockford
Register Star)
Books I can
recommend include:
- Managing Up: 59
Ways to build a Career-Advancing Relationship with Your Boss, by Micheal
S. Dobson and Deborah Singer Dobson
- Managing Transitions:
Making the Most of Change, by William Bridges
- Learning to Lead:
A Workbook on Becoming a Leader, by Warren Bennis & Joan Goldsmith
All three are in workbook-style
and include assessment and goal-setting exercises.
Mary Lynn Martin (American Press Institute)
|